Expansion waves: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
=== Prandtl-Meyer Expansion Waves === | |||
<!-- | |||
\begin{figure}[ht!] | \begin{figure}[ht!] | ||
\begin{center} | \begin{center} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
\end{center} | \end{center} | ||
\end{figure} | \end{figure} | ||
--> | |||
A single Mach wave has a insignificant effect on the flow passing it but an expansion region constitutes an infinite number of Mach waves and the integrated effect is significant. The net turning of the flow by a single Mach wave is depicted schematically in Fig. \ref{fig:machwave}. It can be shown geometrically that | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
d\theta=\sqrt{M^2-1}\frac{dV}{V} | d\theta=\sqrt{M^2-1}\frac{dV}{V} | ||
</math> | |||
Since Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning} is derived from the flow turning geometry with the assumption that the net flow tuning is small, it is valid for all gas models. | |||
To get the integrated effect of all Mach waves in the expansion region, we integrate Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning} over the expansion region | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\int_{\theta_1}^{\theta_2}d\theta=\int_{M_1}^{M_2}\sqrt{M^2-1}\frac{dV}{V} | \int_{\theta_1}^{\theta_2}d\theta=\int_{M_1}^{M_2}\sqrt{M^2-1}\frac{dV}{V} | ||
</math> | |||
To be able to do the integration, we need to rewrite it | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
V=Ma \Rightarrow \ln V=\ln M + \ln a | |||
</math> | |||
Differentiate to get | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{dV}{V}=\frac{dM}{M}+\frac{da}{a} | \frac{dV}{V}=\frac{dM}{M}+\frac{da}{a} | ||
</math> | |||
Each Mach wave is isentropic and thus the expansion is an isentropic process, which means that we can use the adiabatic energy equation | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{T_o}{T}=1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2 | \frac{T_o}{T}=1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2 | ||
</math> | |||
For a calorically perfect gas <math>a=\sqrt{\gamma RT}</math> and <math>a_o=\sqrt{\gamma RT_o}</math> and thus | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{T_o}{T}=\left(\frac{a_o}{a}\right)^2\Rightarrow | |||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\left(\frac{a_o}{a}\right)^2=1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2 | \left(\frac{a_o}{a}\right)^2=1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2 | ||
</math> | |||
Solve for <math>a</math> gives | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
a=a_o \left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-1/2} | a=a_o \left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-1/2} | ||
</math> | |||
Differentiate Eqn \ref{eq:adiatbatic:energy:b} to get | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
da=a_o\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{\gamma-1}{2}\right)2M\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-3/2}dM | da=a_o\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{\gamma-1}{2}\right)2M\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-3/2}dM | ||
</math> | |||
Eqn. \ref{eq:adiatbatic:energy:b} in Eqn. \ref{eq:adiatbatic:energy:c} gives | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{da}{a}=-\left(\frac{\gamma-1}{2}\right)\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-1}MdM | \frac{da}{a}=-\left(\frac{\gamma-1}{2}\right)\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-1}MdM | ||
</math> | |||
From Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning:c}, we have | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{dV}{V}=\frac{dM}{M}+\frac{da}{a} | |||
</math> | |||
With <math>da/a</math> from Eqn. \ref{eq:adiatbatic:energy:d}, we get | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{dV}{V}=\frac{dM}{M}-\left(\frac{\gamma-1}{2}\right)\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-1}MdM | |||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{dV}{V}=dM\left[\frac{\left(1+\dfrac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)-\left(\dfrac{\gamma-1}{2}\right)M^2}{\left(1+\dfrac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)M}\right]=\left(1+\dfrac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-1}\frac{dM}{M} | |||
</math> | |||
Now, insert <math>dV/V</math> in Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning:b} to get | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\int_{\theta_1}^{\theta_2}d\theta=\int_{M_1}^{M_2}\sqrt{M^2-1}\left(1+\dfrac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-1}\frac{dM}{M} | \int_{\theta_1}^{\theta_2}d\theta=\int_{M_1}^{M_2}\sqrt{M^2-1}\left(1+\dfrac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{-1}\frac{dM}{M} | ||
</math> | |||
The integral on the right hand side of Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning:c} is the Prandtl-Meyer function, which is usually denoted <math>\nu</math>. The Prandtl-Meyer function evaluated for Mach number <math>M</math> becomes | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\nu(M)=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}}\tan^{-1}\sqrt{\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}(M^2-1)}-\tan^{-1}\sqrt{M^2-1} | \nu(M)=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}}\tan^{-1}\sqrt{\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}(M^2-1)}-\tan^{-1}\sqrt{M^2-1} | ||
</math> | |||
and thus the net turning of the flow can be calculated as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\theta_2-\theta_1=\nu(M_2)-\nu(M_1) | \theta_2-\theta_1=\nu(M_2)-\nu(M_1) | ||
</math> | |||
==== Solving Problems using the Prandtl Meyer Function ==== | |||
\ | A typical problem is one where we know the net flow turning and the upstream flow conditions and want to calculate the flow conditions downstream of the expansion region. An example of such a problem is given in Fig. \ref{fig:expansion:corner}. | ||
A problem of that type can be solved as follows: | |||
# Calculate <math>\nu{M_1}</math> using Eqn. \ref{eq:prandtl:meyer} or tabulated values | |||
# Calculate <math>\nu(M_2)</math> as <math>\nu(M_2)=\theta_2-\theta_1+\nu(M_1)</math> | |||
# Calculate <math>M_2</math> from the known <math>\nu{M_2}</math> using Eqn. \ref{eq:prandtl:meyer} or tabulated values | |||
<!-- | |||
\begin{figure}[ht!] | \begin{figure}[ht!] | ||
\begin{center} | \begin{center} | ||
| Line 139: | Line 134: | ||
\end{center} | \end{center} | ||
\end{figure} | \end{figure} | ||
--> | |||
The aim is to derive relations of temperature, pressure and density over an expansion wave. Total temperature upstream and downstream of the expansion wave is calculated as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{T_{o_1}}{T_1}=1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M_1^2 | \frac{T_{o_1}}{T_1}=1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M_1^2 | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{T_{o_2}}{T_2}=1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M_2^2 | \frac{T_{o_2}}{T_2}=1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M_2^2 | ||
</math> | |||
The temperature ratio over the expansion wave may now be calculated as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{T_2}{T_1}=\frac{T_2}{T_{o_2}}\frac{T_{o_1}}{T_1}=\frac{1+\dfrac{\gamma-1}{2}M_1^2}{1+\dfrac{\gamma-1}{2}M_2^2}=\frac{2+(\gamma-1)M_1^2}{2+(\gamma-1)M_2^2} | |||
</math> | |||
The expansion is isentropic and thus total temperature and both total pressure are unaffected by the expansion. Therefore, <math>T_{o_1}=T_{o_2}</math> and thus | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{T_2}{T_1}=\frac{2+(\gamma-1)M_1^2}{2+(\gamma-1)M_2^2} | \frac{T_2}{T_1}=\frac{2+(\gamma-1)M_1^2}{2+(\gamma-1)M_2^2} | ||
</math> | |||
The pressure and density ratios can be obtained from Eqn. \ref{eq:tr} using the isentropic relations | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{p_2}{p_1}=\left[\frac{2+(\gamma-1)M_1^2}{2+(\gamma-1)M_2^2}\right]^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)} | \frac{p_2}{p_1}=\left[\frac{2+(\gamma-1)M_1^2}{2+(\gamma-1)M_2^2}\right]^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)} | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}=\left[\frac{2+(\gamma-1)M_1^2}{2+(\gamma-1)M_2^2}\right]^{1/(\gamma-1)} | \frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}=\left[\frac{2+(\gamma-1)M_1^2}{2+(\gamma-1)M_2^2}\right]^{1/(\gamma-1)} | ||
</math> | |||
<!-- | |||
\begin{figure}[ht!] | \begin{figure}[ht!] | ||
\begin{center} | \begin{center} | ||
| Line 183: | Line 176: | ||
\end{center} | \end{center} | ||
\end{figure} | \end{figure} | ||
--> | |||
Revision as of 11:59, 21 March 2026
Prandtl-Meyer Expansion Waves
A single Mach wave has a insignificant effect on the flow passing it but an expansion region constitutes an infinite number of Mach waves and the integrated effect is significant. The net turning of the flow by a single Mach wave is depicted schematically in Fig. \ref{fig:machwave}. It can be shown geometrically that
Since Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning} is derived from the flow turning geometry with the assumption that the net flow tuning is small, it is valid for all gas models.
To get the integrated effect of all Mach waves in the expansion region, we integrate Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning} over the expansion region
To be able to do the integration, we need to rewrite it
Differentiate to get
Each Mach wave is isentropic and thus the expansion is an isentropic process, which means that we can use the adiabatic energy equation
For a calorically perfect gas and and thus
Solve for gives
Differentiate Eqn \ref{eq:adiatbatic:energy:b} to get
Eqn. \ref{eq:adiatbatic:energy:b} in Eqn. \ref{eq:adiatbatic:energy:c} gives
From Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning:c}, we have
With from Eqn. \ref{eq:adiatbatic:energy:d}, we get
Now, insert in Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning:b} to get
The integral on the right hand side of Eqn. \ref{eq:mach:turning:c} is the Prandtl-Meyer function, which is usually denoted . The Prandtl-Meyer function evaluated for Mach number becomes
and thus the net turning of the flow can be calculated as
Solving Problems using the Prandtl Meyer Function
A typical problem is one where we know the net flow turning and the upstream flow conditions and want to calculate the flow conditions downstream of the expansion region. An example of such a problem is given in Fig. \ref{fig:expansion:corner}.
A problem of that type can be solved as follows:
- Calculate using Eqn. \ref{eq:prandtl:meyer} or tabulated values
- Calculate as
- Calculate from the known using Eqn. \ref{eq:prandtl:meyer} or tabulated values
The aim is to derive relations of temperature, pressure and density over an expansion wave. Total temperature upstream and downstream of the expansion wave is calculated as
The temperature ratio over the expansion wave may now be calculated as
The expansion is isentropic and thus total temperature and both total pressure are unaffected by the expansion. Therefore, and thus
The pressure and density ratios can be obtained from Eqn. \ref{eq:tr} using the isentropic relations