Moving shock waves: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
=== Moving Normal Shock Waves === | |||
The starting point is the governing equations for stationary normal shocks (repeated here for convenience). | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\rho_1 u_1 = \rho_2 u_2 | \rho_1 u_1 = \rho_2 u_2 | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\rho_1 u_1^2+p_1 = \rho_2 u_2^2 + p_2 | \rho_1 u_1^2+p_1 = \rho_2 u_2^2 + p_2 | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
h_1 + \frac{1}{2}u_1^2 = h_2 + \frac{1}{2}u_2^2 | h_1 + \frac{1}{2}u_1^2 = h_2 + \frac{1}{2}u_2^2 | ||
</math> | |||
Shock moving to the right with the constant speed $W$ into a gas that is standing still. Moving with the shock, we would see a gas velocity ahead of the shock <math>u_1=W</math>, and the gas behind the shock moves to the right with the velocity <math>u_2=W-u_p</math>. Now, let's insert <math>u_1</math> and <math>u_2</math> in the stationary shock relations \ref{eq:stationary:cont} - \ref{eq:stationary:energy}. | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\rho_1 W = \rho_2 (W-u_p) | \rho_1 W = \rho_2 (W-u_p) | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\rho_1 W^2+p_1 = \rho_2 (W-u_p)^2 + p_2 | \rho_1 W^2+p_1 = \rho_2 (W-u_p)^2 + p_2 | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
h_1 + \frac{1}{2}W^2 = h_2 + \frac{1}{2}(W-u_p)^2 | h_1 + \frac{1}{2}W^2 = h_2 + \frac{1}{2}(W-u_p)^2 | ||
</math> | |||
Rewriting Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont} | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
(W-u_p) = W \frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2} | (W-u_p) = W \frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2} | ||
</math> | |||
Inserting Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont:mod} in Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:mom} gives | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
p_1+\rho_1 W^2 = p_2+\rho_2 W^2\left(\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)^2 \Rightarrow p_2-p_1 = \rho_1W^2\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | p_1+\rho_1 W^2 = p_2+\rho_2 W^2\left(\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)^2 \Rightarrow p_2-p_1 = \rho_1W^2\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
W^2=\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}\right) | W^2=\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
From the continuity equation \ref{eq:unsteady:cont}, we get | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
W = (W-u_p) \left(\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}\right) | W = (W-u_p) \left(\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
Inserting Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont:modb} in Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:mom:mod} gives | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
(W-u_p)^2=\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | (W-u_p)^2=\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
Now, let's insert Eqns. \ref{eq:unsteady:mom:mod} and \ref{eq:unsteady:mom:modb} in the energy equation (Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:energy}). | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
h_1 + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}\right)\right] = h_2 + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)\right] | h_1 + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}\right)\right] = h_2 + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)\right] | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
h=e+\frac{p}{\rho} | h=e+\frac{p}{\rho} | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
e_1 + \frac{p_1}{\rho_1} + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}\right)\right] = e_2 + \frac{p_2}{\rho_2} + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)\right] | e_1 + \frac{p_1}{\rho_1} + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}\right)\right] = e_2 + \frac{p_2}{\rho_2} + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{p_2-p_1}{\rho_2-\rho_1}\left(\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)\right] | ||
</math> | |||
which can be rewritten as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
e_2-e_1=\frac{p_1+p_2}{2}\left(\frac{1}{\rho_1}-\frac{1}{\rho_2}\right) | e_2-e_1=\frac{p_1+p_2}{2}\left(\frac{1}{\rho_1}-\frac{1}{\rho_2}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
Eqn \ref{eq:unsteady:hugonoit} is the same Hugoniot equation as we get for a stationary normal shock. The Hugoniot equation is a relation of thermodynamic properties over a shock. As the shock in the unsteady case is moving with a constant velocity, the frame of reference moving with the shock is an inertial frame and thus the same physical relations apply in the moving shock case as in the stationary shock case. The fact that the Hugoniot relation does not include any velocities or Mach numbers but only thermodynamic properties, the relation will be unchanged for a moving shock. | |||
=== Moving Shock Relations === | |||
For a calorically perfect gas we have <math>e=C_v T</math>. Inserted in the Hugoniot relation above this gives | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
C_v(T_2-T_1)=\frac{p_1+p_2}{2}\left(\nu_1-\nu_2\right) | C_v(T_2-T_1)=\frac{p_1+p_2}{2}\left(\nu_1-\nu_2\right) | ||
</math> | |||
where | where <math>\nu=1/\rho</math> | ||
Now, using the ideal gas law <math>T=p\nu/R</math> and <math>C_v/R=1/(\gamma-1)</math> gives | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\left(\frac{1}{\gamma-1}\right)(p_2\nu_2-p_1\nu_1)=\frac{p_1+p_2}{2}\left(\nu_1-\nu_2\right) | \left(\frac{1}{\gamma-1}\right)(p_2\nu_2-p_1\nu_1)=\frac{p_1+p_2}{2}\left(\nu_1-\nu_2\right) | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\Leftrightarrow | \Leftrightarrow | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
p_2\left(\frac{\nu_2}{\gamma-1}-\frac{\nu_1-\nu_2}{2}\right)=p_1\left(\frac{\nu_1}{\gamma-1}+\frac{\nu_1-\nu_2}{2}\right) | p_2\left(\frac{\nu_2}{\gamma-1}-\frac{\nu_1-\nu_2}{2}\right)=p_1\left(\frac{\nu_1}{\gamma-1}+\frac{\nu_1-\nu_2}{2}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
From this result, we can derive a relation for the pressure ratio over the shock as a function of density ratio | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{p_2}{p_1}=\frac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{\nu_1}{\nu_2}\right)-1}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)-\left(\dfrac{\nu_1}{\nu_2}\right)} | \frac{p_2}{p_1}=\frac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{\nu_1}{\nu_2}\right)-1}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)-\left(\dfrac{\nu_1}{\nu_2}\right)} | ||
</math> | |||
<math>\nu=RT/p</math> and thus | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{\nu_1}{\nu_2}=\frac{T_1}{T_2}\frac{p_2}{p_1} | \frac{\nu_1}{\nu_2}=\frac{T_1}{T_2}\frac{p_2}{p_1} | ||
</math> | |||
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:density:ratio} in Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:hugonoit:c} gives | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{p_2}{p_1}=\frac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{T_1}{T_2}\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)-1}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)-\left(\dfrac{T_1}{T_2}\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)} | \frac{p_2}{p_1}=\frac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{T_1}{T_2}\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)-1}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)-\left(\dfrac{T_1}{T_2}\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)} | ||
</math> | |||
Now, we can get a relation for calculation of the temperature ratio over the moving shock as function of the shock pressure ratio | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{T_2}{T_1}=\frac{p_2}{p_1}\left[\frac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}\right] | \frac{T_2}{T_1}=\frac{p_2}{p_1}\left[\frac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}\right] | ||
</math> | |||
Once again using the ideal gas law | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}=\frac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)} | \frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}=\frac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)} | ||
</math> | |||
Going back to the momentum equation | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
p_2-p_1 = \rho_1W^2\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)=\left\{W=M_s a_1\right\}=\rho_1M_s^2a_1^2\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | p_2-p_1 = \rho_1W^2\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)=\left\{W=M_s a_1\right\}=\rho_1M_s^2a_1^2\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
with <math>a_1^2=\gamma p_1/\rho_1</math>, we get | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{p_2}{p_1} = \gamma M_s^2\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)+1 | \frac{p_2}{p_1} = \gamma M_s^2\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)+1 | ||
</math> | |||
From the normal shock relations, we have | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2} = \frac{2+(\gamma-1)M_s^2}{(\gamma+1)M_s^2} | \frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2} = \frac{2+(\gamma-1)M_s^2}{(\gamma+1)M_s^2} | ||
</math> | |||
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:Mach:b} in \ref{eq:unsteady:Mach:a} gives | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{p_2}{p_1} = 1 + \left(\frac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\right)(M_s^2-1) | \frac{p_2}{p_1} = 1 + \left(\frac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\right)(M_s^2-1) | ||
</math> | |||
or | or | ||
<math display="block"> | |||
M_s=\sqrt{\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\right)\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1} | M_s=\sqrt{\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\right)\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1} | ||
</math> | |||
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:Mach} with <math>M_s=W/a_1</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
W=a_1\sqrt{\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\right)\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1} | W=a_1\sqrt{\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\right)\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1} | ||
</math> | |||
==== Induced Flow Behind Moving Shock ==== | |||
Let's try to find a relation for calculation of the induced velocity behind the moving shock. Once again, the starting point is the continuity equation for moving shocks (Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont}) repeated here for convenience | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\rho_1 W = \rho_2 (W-u_p) | \rho_1 W = \rho_2 (W-u_p) | ||
</math> | |||
The induced velocity appears on the right side of the continuity equation | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
W (\rho_1-\rho_2) = -\rho_2 u_p | W (\rho_1-\rho_2) = -\rho_2 u_p | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
u_p = W \left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | u_p = W \left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
From before we have a relation for $W$ as a function of pressure ratio and one for <math>\rho_1/\rho_2</math>, also as a function of pressure ratio. | |||
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up:a} togheter with Eqns. \ref{eq:unsteady:W} and \ref{eq:unsteady:density:ratio} gives | Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up:a} togheter with Eqns. \ref{eq:unsteady:W} and \ref{eq:unsteady:density:ratio} gives | ||
<math display="block"> | |||
u_p=a_1\underbrace{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\right)\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1}}_{I}\underbrace{\left[1-\dfrac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}\right]}_{II} | u_p=a_1\underbrace{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\right)\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1}}_{I}\underbrace{\left[1-\dfrac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}\right]}_{II} | ||
</math> | |||
The equation subsets I and II can be rewritten as: | |||
Term I: | Term I: | ||
<math display="block"> | |||
\sqrt{\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\right)\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1}=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\left[\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}\right)+\left(\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}\right)\right]} | \sqrt{\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\right)\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1}=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\left[\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}\right)+\left(\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}\right)\right]} | ||
</math> | |||
Term II: | Term II: | ||
<math display="block"> | |||
\left[1-\dfrac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}\right]=\frac{1}{\gamma}\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)\frac{\left(\dfrac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\right)}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)} | \left[1-\dfrac{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}\right]=\frac{1}{\gamma}\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)\frac{\left(\dfrac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\right)}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)} | ||
</math> | |||
the rewritten terms I and II implemented, Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up:b} becomes | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
u_p=\frac{a_1}{\gamma}\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)\sqrt{\frac{\left(\dfrac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\right)}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}} | u_p=\frac{a_1}{\gamma}\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)\sqrt{\frac{\left(\dfrac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\right)}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}} | ||
</math> | |||
Since the region behind the moving shock is region 2, the induced flow Mach number is obtained as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
M_p=\frac{u_p}{a_2}=\frac{u_p}{a_1}\frac{a_1}{a_2}=\frac{u_p}{a_1}\sqrt{\frac{\gamma R T_1}{\gamma R T_2}}=\frac{u_p}{a_1}\sqrt{\frac{T_1}{T_2}} | M_p=\frac{u_p}{a_2}=\frac{u_p}{a_1}\frac{a_1}{a_2}=\frac{u_p}{a_1}\sqrt{\frac{\gamma R T_1}{\gamma R T_2}}=\frac{u_p}{a_1}\sqrt{\frac{T_1}{T_2}} | ||
</math> | |||
With <math>up/a_1</math> from Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up} and <math>T_1/T_2</math> from Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:temperature:ratio} | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
M_p=\frac{1}{\gamma}\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)\left(\frac{\left(\dfrac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\right)}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}\right)^{1/2} | M_p=\frac{1}{\gamma}\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)\left(\frac{\left(\dfrac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\right)}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma-1}{\gamma+1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}\right)^{1/2} | ||
\left(\frac{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)^2}\right)^{1/2} | \left(\frac{1+\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)}{\left(\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)+\left(\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}\right)^2}\right)^{1/2} | ||
</math> | |||
There is a theoretical upper limit for the induced Mach number <math>M_p</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\lim_{p_2/p_1\rightarrow\infty} M_p\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}\right)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\gamma(\gamma-1)}} | \lim_{p_2/p_1\rightarrow\infty} M_p\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}\right)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\gamma(\gamma-1)}} | ||
</math> | |||
As can be seen, at the upper limit the induced Mach number is a function of <math>\gamma</math> and for air (<math>\gamma=1.4</math>) we get | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\lim_{p_2/p_1\rightarrow\infty} M_p\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}\right)\simeq 1.89 | \lim_{p_2/p_1\rightarrow\infty} M_p\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}\right)\simeq 1.89 | ||
</math> | |||
\section{Shock Wave Reflection} | \section{Shock Wave Reflection} | ||
When the incident shock wave reaches the wall, a shock propagating in the opposite direction is generated with a shock strength such that the velocity of the induced flow behind the incident shock is reduced to zero. The flow can not go through the wall and thus the velocity must be zero in the vicinity of the wall. The properties of the incident shock wave are directly related to the pressure ratio over the shock wave. Therefore, it would be convenient to have a relation between the reflected shock wave and incident shock wave. | |||
<!-- | |||
\begin{figure}[ht!] | \begin{figure}[ht!] | ||
\begin{center} | \begin{center} | ||
| Line 295: | Line 262: | ||
\end{center} | \end{center} | ||
\end{figure} | \end{figure} | ||
--> | |||
==== The Incident Shock Wave ==== | |||
The pressure ratio over the incident shock in Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection} can be obtained as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{p_2}{p_1}=1+\frac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\left(M_s^2-1\right) | \frac{p_2}{p_1}=1+\frac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\left(M_s^2-1\right) | ||
</math> | |||
where <math>M_s</math> is the wave Mach number, which is calculated as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
M_s=\frac{W}{a_1} | M_s=\frac{W}{a_1} | ||
</math> | |||
In Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:Mach:def}, <math>W</math> is the speed with which the incident shock wave travels into region 1 and <math>a_1</math> is the speed of sound in region 1 (see Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection}). | |||
Solving Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:pr} for <math>M_s</math>, we get | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
M_s=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1} | M_s=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\left(\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1\right)+1} | ||
</math> | |||
Anderson derives the relations for calculation of the ratio <math>T_2/T_1</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{T_2}{T_1}=\frac{p_2}{p_1}\left(\dfrac{\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}+\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}}{1+\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}}\right) | \frac{T_2}{T_1}=\frac{p_2}{p_1}\left(\dfrac{\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}+\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}}{1+\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
From Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:tr} it is easy to get the corresponding relation for <math>\rho_2/\rho_1</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}=\dfrac{1+\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}}{\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}+\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}} | \frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}=\dfrac{1+\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}}{\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}+\dfrac{p_2}{p_1}} | ||
</math> | |||
Anderson also shows how to obtain the induced velocity, <math>u_p</math>, behind the incident shock wave, {\emph{i.e.}} the velocity in region 2 (see Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection}). | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
u_p=W\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)=M_s a_1 \left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | u_p=W\left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)=M_s a_1 \left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
==== The Reflected Shock Wave ==== | |||
The pressure ratio over the reflected shock can be obtained from Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:pr} by analogy | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{p_5}{p_2}=1+\frac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\left(M_r^2-1\right) | \frac{p_5}{p_2}=1+\frac{2\gamma}{\gamma+1}\left(M_r^2-1\right) | ||
</math> | |||
where <math>M_r</math> is the Mach number of the reflected shock wave defined as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
M_r=\frac{W_r+u_p}{a_2} | M_r=\frac{W_r+u_p}{a_2} | ||
</math> | |||
where <math>W_r</math> is the speed of the reflected shock wave and <math>a_2</math> is the speed of sound in region 2 (see Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection}). | |||
Solving Eqn.~\ref{eq:reflected:pr} for <math>M_r</math> gives | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
M_r=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\left(\frac{p_5}{p_2}-1\right)+1} | M_r=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\left(\frac{p_5}{p_2}-1\right)+1} | ||
</math> | |||
The ratios <math>T_5/T_2</math> and <math>\rho_5/\rho_2</math> can be obtained from Eqns.~\ref{eq:incident:tr} and \ref{eq:incident:rr} by analogy | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{T_5}{T_2}=\frac{p_5}{p_2}\left(\dfrac{\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}+\dfrac{p_5}{p_2}}{1+\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\dfrac{p_5}{p_2}}\right) | \frac{T_5}{T_2}=\frac{p_5}{p_2}\left(\dfrac{\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}+\dfrac{p_5}{p_2}}{1+\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\dfrac{p_5}{p_2}}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\frac{\rho_5}{\rho_2}=\dfrac{1+\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\dfrac{p_5}{p_2}}{\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}+\dfrac{p_5}{p_2}} | \frac{\rho_5}{\rho_2}=\dfrac{1+\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\dfrac{p_5}{p_2}}{\dfrac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}+\dfrac{p_5}{p_2}} | ||
</math> | |||
The velocity in region 2 which is the same as the induced flow velocity behind the incident shock wave can be obtained as | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
u_p=W_r\left(\frac{\rho_5}{\rho_2}-1\right)=M_r a_2 \left(1-\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_5}\right) | u_p=W_r\left(\frac{\rho_5}{\rho_2}-1\right)=M_r a_2 \left(1-\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_5}\right) | ||
</math> | |||
\subsection{Reflected Shock Relation} | \subsection{Reflected Shock Relation} | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 21 March 2026
Moving Normal Shock Waves
The starting point is the governing equations for stationary normal shocks (repeated here for convenience).
Shock moving to the right with the constant speed $W$ into a gas that is standing still. Moving with the shock, we would see a gas velocity ahead of the shock , and the gas behind the shock moves to the right with the velocity . Now, let's insert and in the stationary shock relations \ref{eq:stationary:cont} - \ref{eq:stationary:energy}.
Rewriting Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont}
Inserting Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont:mod} in Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:mom} gives
From the continuity equation \ref{eq:unsteady:cont}, we get
Inserting Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont:modb} in Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:mom:mod} gives
Now, let's insert Eqns. \ref{eq:unsteady:mom:mod} and \ref{eq:unsteady:mom:modb} in the energy equation (Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:energy}).
which can be rewritten as
Eqn \ref{eq:unsteady:hugonoit} is the same Hugoniot equation as we get for a stationary normal shock. The Hugoniot equation is a relation of thermodynamic properties over a shock. As the shock in the unsteady case is moving with a constant velocity, the frame of reference moving with the shock is an inertial frame and thus the same physical relations apply in the moving shock case as in the stationary shock case. The fact that the Hugoniot relation does not include any velocities or Mach numbers but only thermodynamic properties, the relation will be unchanged for a moving shock.
Moving Shock Relations
For a calorically perfect gas we have . Inserted in the Hugoniot relation above this gives
where
Now, using the ideal gas law and gives
From this result, we can derive a relation for the pressure ratio over the shock as a function of density ratio
and thus
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:density:ratio} in Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:hugonoit:c} gives
Now, we can get a relation for calculation of the temperature ratio over the moving shock as function of the shock pressure ratio
Once again using the ideal gas law
Going back to the momentum equation
with , we get
From the normal shock relations, we have
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:Mach:b} in \ref{eq:unsteady:Mach:a} gives
or
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:Mach} with
Induced Flow Behind Moving Shock
Let's try to find a relation for calculation of the induced velocity behind the moving shock. Once again, the starting point is the continuity equation for moving shocks (Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont}) repeated here for convenience
The induced velocity appears on the right side of the continuity equation
From before we have a relation for $W$ as a function of pressure ratio and one for , also as a function of pressure ratio.
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up:a} togheter with Eqns. \ref{eq:unsteady:W} and \ref{eq:unsteady:density:ratio} gives
The equation subsets I and II can be rewritten as:
Term I:
Term II:
the rewritten terms I and II implemented, Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up:b} becomes
Since the region behind the moving shock is region 2, the induced flow Mach number is obtained as
With from Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up} and from Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:temperature:ratio}
There is a theoretical upper limit for the induced Mach number
As can be seen, at the upper limit the induced Mach number is a function of and for air () we get
\section{Shock Wave Reflection}
When the incident shock wave reaches the wall, a shock propagating in the opposite direction is generated with a shock strength such that the velocity of the induced flow behind the incident shock is reduced to zero. The flow can not go through the wall and thus the velocity must be zero in the vicinity of the wall. The properties of the incident shock wave are directly related to the pressure ratio over the shock wave. Therefore, it would be convenient to have a relation between the reflected shock wave and incident shock wave.
The Incident Shock Wave
The pressure ratio over the incident shock in Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection} can be obtained as
where is the wave Mach number, which is calculated as
In Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:Mach:def}, is the speed with which the incident shock wave travels into region 1 and is the speed of sound in region 1 (see Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection}).
Solving Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:pr} for , we get
Anderson derives the relations for calculation of the ratio
From Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:tr} it is easy to get the corresponding relation for
Anderson also shows how to obtain the induced velocity, , behind the incident shock wave, {\emph{i.e.}} the velocity in region 2 (see Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection}).
The Reflected Shock Wave
The pressure ratio over the reflected shock can be obtained from Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:pr} by analogy
where is the Mach number of the reflected shock wave defined as
where is the speed of the reflected shock wave and is the speed of sound in region 2 (see Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection}).
Solving Eqn.~\ref{eq:reflected:pr} for gives
The ratios and can be obtained from Eqns.~\ref{eq:incident:tr} and \ref{eq:incident:rr} by analogy
The velocity in region 2 which is the same as the induced flow velocity behind the incident shock wave can be obtained as
\subsection{Reflected Shock Relation}
\noindent With the relations for the incident shock wave and reflected shock wave defined, we now have the tools to derive a relation between the incident and reflected shock waves. The induced flow velocity $u_p$ calculated using the relation obtained for the incident shock wave must of course be the same as when calculated using reflected wave properties, {\emph{i.e.}} the result of Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:up} is identical to that of Eqn.~\ref{eq:reflected:up}\\
\begin{equation} M_r a_2 \left(1-\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_5}\right)=M_s a_1 \left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) \label{eq:relation:a} \end{equation}\\
\noindent rewriting gives \\
\begin{equation} M_r \left(1-\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_5}\right)=M_s \left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) \frac{a_1}{a_2} \label{eq:relation:b} \end{equation}\\
\noindent Assuming calorically perfect gas gives $a=\sqrt{\gamma RT}$ and thus\\
\begin{equation} M_r \left(1-\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_5}\right)=M_s \left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right) \sqrt{\frac{T_1}{T_2}} \label{eq:relation:c} \end{equation}\\
\noindent Let's first look at the term on the left hand side of Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:c}\\
\begin{equation*} M_r \left(1-\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_5}\right) \end{equation*}\\
\noindent Using the $\rho_5/\rho_2$ and $p_2/p_5$ from Eqns.~\ref{eq:reflected:rr} and~\ref{eq:reflected:pr} and simplifying gives\\
\begin{equation} M_r \left(1-\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_5}\right)=\left(\frac{2}{\gamma+1}\right)\left(\frac{M_r^2-1}{M_r}\right) \label{eq:relation:d} \end{equation}\\
\noindent Using the same approach on the corresponding term for the incident shock wave on the right hand side of Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:c} gives\\
\begin{equation} M_s \left(1-\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)=\left(\frac{2}{\gamma+1}\right)\left(\frac{M_s^2-1}{M_s}\right) \label{eq:relation:e} \end{equation}\\
\noindent Now, inserting~\ref{eq:relation:d} and~\ref{eq:relation:e} in Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:c} gives\\
\begin{equation} \left(\frac{2}{\gamma+1}\right)\left(\frac{M_r^2-1}{M_r}\right)=\left(\frac{2}{\gamma+1}\right)\left(\frac{M_s^2-1}{M_s}\right)\sqrt{\frac{T_1}{T_2}} \label{eq:relation:f} \end{equation}\\
\noindent Simplifying and inverting gives\\
\begin{equation} \left(\frac{M_r}{M_r^2-1}\right)=\left(\frac{M_s}{M_s^2-1}\right)\sqrt{\frac{T_2}{T_1}} \label{eq:relation:g} \end{equation}\\
\noindent The rightmost term in Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:g} ($\sqrt{T_2/T_1}$) needs to be rewritten. Inserting~\ref{eq:incident:pr} in~\ref{eq:incident:tr} and expanding all terms gives\\
\begin{align*} \frac{T_2}{T_1} & =\frac{2(\gamma+1) + (\gamma+1)(\gamma-1)M_s^2+4\gamma(M_s^2-1)+2\gamma(\gamma-1)M_s^2(M_s^2-1)}{(\gamma+1)^2M_s^2} = \\
& \\
& =\frac{2(\gamma+1) + (\gamma+1)(\gamma-1)M_s^2+4\gamma(M_s^2-1)}{(\gamma+1)^2M_s^2}+\frac{2(\gamma-1)}{(\gamma+1)^2}(M_s^2-1)\gamma = \\
& \\
& =\dfrac{2(\gamma+1) + (\gamma+1)(\gamma-1)M_s^2+4\gamma(M_s^2-1)-(2(\gamma-1)(M_s^2-1))}{(\gamma+1)^2M_s^2}+\nonumber\\
& \dfrac{2(\gamma-1)}{(\gamma+1)^2}(M_s^2-1)\left(\gamma+\dfrac{1}{M_s^2}\right)
\end{align*}\\
\noindent Finally we end up with the following relation\\
\begin{equation} \frac{T_2}{T_1}=1+\frac{2(\gamma-1)}{(\gamma+1)^2}(M_s^2-1)\left(\gamma+\frac{1}{M_s^2}\right) \label{eq:relation:tr} \end{equation}\\
\noindent The temperature ratio over the incident shock wave is now totally defined by the incident Mach number $M_s$ and the ratio of specific heats $\gamma$. With~\ref{eq:relation:tr} in~\ref{eq:relation:g} we get the sought relation between the reflected and incident Mach numbers.\\
\begin{equation} \left(\frac{M_r}{M_r^2-1}\right)=\left(\frac{M_s}{M_s^2-1}\right)\sqrt{1+\frac{2(\gamma-1)}{(\gamma+1)^2}(M_s^2-1)\left(\gamma+\frac{1}{M_s^2}\right)} \label{eq:relation:final} \end{equation}\\
\noindent It should be noted that Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:final} is valid for calorically perfect gases only.