Moving shock waves: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
--><nomobile><!-- | --><nomobile><!-- | ||
__TOC__<!-- | -->__TOC__<!-- | ||
--></nomobile><!-- | --></nomobile><!-- | ||
Latest revision as of 13:37, 1 April 2026
Moving Normal Shock Waves
The starting point is the governing equations for stationary normal shocks (repeated here for convenience).
| (Eq. 6.1) |
| (Eq. 6.2) |
| (Eq. 6.3) |
Shock moving to the right with the constant speed $W$ into a gas that is standing still. Moving with the shock, we would see a gas velocity ahead of the shock , and the gas behind the shock moves to the right with the velocity . Now, let's insert and in the stationary shock relations \ref{eq:stationary:cont} - \ref{eq:stationary:energy}.
| (Eq. 6.4) |
| (Eq. 6.5) |
| (Eq. 6.6) |
Rewriting Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont}
| (Eq. 6.7) |
Inserting Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont:mod} in Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:mom} gives
| (Eq. 6.8) |
| (Eq. 6.9) |
From the continuity equation \ref{eq:unsteady:cont}, we get
| (Eq. 6.10) |
Inserting Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont:modb} in Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:mom:mod} gives
| (Eq. 6.11) |
Now, let's insert Eqns. \ref{eq:unsteady:mom:mod} and \ref{eq:unsteady:mom:modb} in the energy equation (Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:energy}).
| (Eq. 6.12) |
| (Eq. 6.13) |
| (Eq. 6.14) |
which can be rewritten as
| (Eq. 6.15) |
Eqn \ref{eq:unsteady:hugonoit} is the same Hugoniot equation as we get for a stationary normal shock. The Hugoniot equation is a relation of thermodynamic properties over a shock. As the shock in the unsteady case is moving with a constant velocity, the frame of reference moving with the shock is an inertial frame and thus the same physical relations apply in the moving shock case as in the stationary shock case. The fact that the Hugoniot relation does not include any velocities or Mach numbers but only thermodynamic properties, the relation will be unchanged for a moving shock.
Moving Shock Relations
For a calorically perfect gas we have . Inserted in the Hugoniot relation above this gives
| (Eq. 6.16) |
where
Now, using the ideal gas law and gives
| (Eq. 6.17) |
From this result, we can derive a relation for the pressure ratio over the shock as a function of density ratio
| (Eq. 6.18) |
and thus
| (Eq. 6.19) |
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:density:ratio} in Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:hugonoit:c} gives
| (Eq. 6.20) |
Now, we can get a relation for calculation of the temperature ratio over the moving shock as function of the shock pressure ratio
| (Eq. 6.21) |
Once again using the ideal gas law
| (Eq. 6.22) |
Going back to the momentum equation
| (Eq. 6.23) |
with , we get
| (Eq. 6.24) |
From the normal shock relations, we have
| (Eq. 6.25) |
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:Mach:b} in \ref{eq:unsteady:Mach:a} gives
| (Eq. 6.26) |
or
| (Eq. 6.27) |
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:Mach} with
| (Eq. 6.28) |
Induced Flow Behind Moving Shock
Let's try to find a relation for calculation of the induced velocity behind the moving shock. Once again, the starting point is the continuity equation for moving shocks (Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:cont}) repeated here for convenience
| (Eq. 6.29) |
The induced velocity appears on the right side of the continuity equation
| (Eq. 6.30) |
| (Eq. 6.31) |
From before we have a relation for $W$ as a function of pressure ratio and one for , also as a function of pressure ratio.
Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up:a} togheter with Eqns. \ref{eq:unsteady:W} and \ref{eq:unsteady:density:ratio} gives
| (Eq. 6.32) |
The equation subsets I and II can be rewritten as:
Term I:
| (Eq. 6.33) |
Term II:
| (Eq. 6.34) |
the rewritten terms I and II implemented, Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up:b} becomes
| (Eq. 6.35) |
Since the region behind the moving shock is region 2, the induced flow Mach number is obtained as
| (Eq. 6.36) |
With from Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:up} and from Eqn. \ref{eq:unsteady:temperature:ratio}
| (Eq. 6.37) |
There is a theoretical upper limit for the induced Mach number
| (Eq. 6.38) |
As can be seen, at the upper limit the induced Mach number is a function of and for air () we get
| (Eq. 6.39) |
Shock Wave Reflection
When the incident shock wave reaches the wall, a shock propagating in the opposite direction is generated with a shock strength such that the velocity of the induced flow behind the incident shock is reduced to zero. The flow can not go through the wall and thus the velocity must be zero in the vicinity of the wall. The properties of the incident shock wave are directly related to the pressure ratio over the shock wave. Therefore, it would be convenient to have a relation between the reflected shock wave and incident shock wave.
The Incident Shock Wave
The pressure ratio over the incident shock in Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection} can be obtained as
| (Eq. 6.40) |
where is the wave Mach number, which is calculated as
| (Eq. 6.41) |
In Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:Mach:def}, is the speed with which the incident shock wave travels into region 1 and is the speed of sound in region 1 (see Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection}).
Solving Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:pr} for , we get
| (Eq. 6.42) |
Anderson derives the relations for calculation of the ratio
| (Eq. 6.43) |
From Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:tr} it is easy to get the corresponding relation for
| (Eq. 6.44) |
Anderson also shows how to obtain the induced velocity, , behind the incident shock wave, {\emph{i.e.}} the velocity in region 2 (see Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection}).
| (Eq. 6.45) |
The Reflected Shock Wave
The pressure ratio over the reflected shock can be obtained from Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:pr} by analogy
| (Eq. 6.46) |
where is the Mach number of the reflected shock wave defined as
| (Eq. 6.47) |
where is the speed of the reflected shock wave and is the speed of sound in region 2 (see Fig.~\ref{fig:reflection}).
Solving Eqn.~\ref{eq:reflected:pr} for gives
| (Eq. 6.48) |
The ratios and can be obtained from Eqns.~\ref{eq:incident:tr} and \ref{eq:incident:rr} by analogy
| (Eq. 6.49) |
| (Eq. 6.50) |
The velocity in region 2 which is the same as the induced flow velocity behind the incident shock wave can be obtained as
| (Eq. 6.51) |
Reflected Shock Relation
With the relations for the incident shock wave and reflected shock wave defined, we now have the tools to derive a relation between the incident and reflected shock waves. The induced flow velocity $u_p$ calculated using the relation obtained for the incident shock wave must of course be the same as when calculated using reflected wave properties, {\emph{i.e.}} the result of Eqn.~\ref{eq:incident:up} is identical to that of Eqn.~\ref{eq:reflected:up}
| (Eq. 6.52) |
rewriting gives
| (Eq. 6.53) |
Assuming calorically perfect gas gives and thus
| (Eq. 6.54) |
Let's first look at the term on the left hand side of Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:c}
| (Eq. 6.55) |
Using the and from Eqns.~\ref{eq:reflected:rr} and~\ref{eq:reflected:pr} and simplifying gives
| (Eq. 6.56) |
Using the same approach on the corresponding term for the incident shock wave on the right hand side of Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:c} gives
| (Eq. 6.57) |
Now, inserting~\ref{eq:relation:d} and~\ref{eq:relation:e} in Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:c} gives
| (Eq. 6.58) |
Simplifying and inverting gives
| (Eq. 6.59) |
The rightmost term in Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:g} () needs to be rewritten. Inserting~\ref{eq:incident:pr} in~\ref{eq:incident:tr} and expanding all terms gives
| (Eq. 6.60) |
Finally we end up with the following relation
| (Eq. 6.61) |
The temperature ratio over the incident shock wave is now totally defined by the incident Mach number and the ratio of specific heats . With~\ref{eq:relation:tr} in~\ref{eq:relation:g} we get the sought relation between the reflected and incident Mach numbers.
| (Eq. 6.62) |
It should be noted that Eqn.~\ref{eq:relation:final} is valid for calorically perfect gases only.